View: Threaded | Collapsed Threads | By Date

Subject	Author	Date
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Simon St.Laurent	Mar 5 2002 1:05PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Eric van der Vlist	Mar 5 2002 12:51PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Eric van der Vlist	Mar 5 2002 12:46PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces and URIs (was: A good case for ...	Anderson, John	Mar 5 2002 12:36PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Anderson, John	Mar 5 2002 12:21PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Klaus Backert	Mar 5 2002 12:11PM
RE: [xml-dev] A good case for namespace URIs	Nicolas LEHUEN	Mar 5 2002 8:26AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML to Oracle	Jurgen	Mar 5 2002 7:58AM
[xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Eric van der Vlist	Mar 5 2002 7:53AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML to Oracle	Dipankar Chakrabarti	Mar 5 2002 5:16AM
[xml-dev] What is an XML Document? [Was: Re: [xml-dev] ...	Elliotte Rusty Harold	Mar 5 2002 3:40AM
Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization	Elliotte Rusty Harold	Mar 5 2002 3:31AM
[xml-dev] SCI2002 "Business Process Modeling and ...	Jian Wang	Mar 5 2002 1:29AM
[xml-dev] SCI2002 "Business Process Modeling and ...	Jian Wang	Mar 5 2002 1:21AM
Re: [xml-dev] HTML parser	Daniel Veillard	Mar 5 2002 12:49AM
Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization	Daniel Veillard	Mar 5 2002 12:44AM
Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization	Daniel Veillard	Mar 5 2002 12:20AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML should NOT be a new programming language	David Starr	Mar 4 2002 11:50PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces and URIs (was: A good case for ...	Ronald Bourret	Mar 4 2002 11:36PM
Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization	Marcus Carr	Mar 4 2002 11:24PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces and URIs (was: A good case for ...	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	Mar 4 2002 9:45PM