View: Threaded | Collapsed Threads | By Date

Subject	Author	Date
Re: RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML ...	Mike Champion	Mar 5 2002 7:05PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	Mar 5 2002 4:43PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?...	Mar 5 2002 4:50PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?...	Mar 5 2002 4:48PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Atchley, John	Mar 5 2002 3:15PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	Mar 5 2002 4:11PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	Mar 5 2002 3:46PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	Mar 5 2002 3:43PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right	Bullard, Claude L (Len)	Mar 5 2002 3:39PM
[xml-dev] SCI2002 "Business Process Modeling and ...	Jian Wang	Mar 5 2002 1:29AM
RE: [xml-dev] A good case for namespace URIs	Nicolas LEHUEN	Mar 5 2002 8:26AM
RE: [xml-dev] A good case for namespace URIs	Andy Greener	Mar 5 2002 1:25PM
[xml-dev] SCI2002 "Business Process Modeling and ...	Jian Wang	Mar 5 2002 1:21AM
[xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Eric van der Vlist	Mar 5 2002 7:53AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Francis Norton	Mar 5 2002 3:48PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Eric van der Vlist	Mar 5 2002 12:46PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?...	Mar 5 2002 4:01PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its ...	Eric van der Vlist	Mar 5 2002 4:26PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Simon St.Laurent	Mar 5 2002 3:22PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Michael Fitzgerald	Mar 5 2002 5:55PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".	Mike Champion	Mar 5 2002 1:34PM