Bob Kline wrote:
>  The last time we brought up this question [back in 2004] Trent Mick wrote:
> > Unfortunately, that limbo will have to remain for the time being.  
> > We'll be
> > catching up with ActivePython builds fairly soon, but there likely won't
> > be a PyPPM replacement for some time.
>  
>  Hello, Trent.  I think you'll agree we've not been nagging you 
>  constantly about this question. 

Very true.

 >  We're just hoping that you're not using
>  "some time" as a euphemism for "forever." :-)
>  
>  Any update on this topic that you can throw our way?

Unfortunately, no. Setuptools and PyPI have really come a long way and, 
somewhat, changed the game. What *hasn't* changed is that I don't have 
as much time as I would like to work on this. Currently there are no 
plans to have a PyPPM replacement anytime soon.

Trent

-- 
Trent Mick
trentm at activestate.com
_______________________________________________
ActivePython mailing list
ActivePython@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
Other options: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/ActivePython