Hi Niall,

Please post Boost.Python questions to the C++-sig (see
http://www.boost.org/more/mailing_lists.htm).

"Niall Douglas" <ned@[...].com>  writes:

>  Hi,
> 
>  I was wondering if Boost.Python could be extended such that:
> 
>  enum_<int>("").value("CONST", CONST);
> 
>  .. would place its members in the highest scope possible ie; you'd 
>  access it as my_module.CONST.

We have an export_values() member function which accomplishes that.

http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/v2/enum.html#enum_-spec
 
>  I suggest this because the library I'm creating bindings for has 
>  loads of unnamed enums at global scope for creating constants and 
>  sticking them in some "unnamed" scope is counter-intuitive. Since 
>  pyste has to deal with these, it creates problems :(

If you're using Pyste, you *really* should post this to the C++-sig,
since Nicodemus (the Pyste author) doesn't read my emails.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig