Ilia Iourovitski wrote:
>  Not good enough.
>  
>  Currently Jython is one man show and the man is very
>  busy. How can you depend on the language without
>  active 
>  community? 

this is fairly offensive for the people that during this year
have contributed patches that will end up in 2.2 (Thanks to them),
that they are still uncommitted is more a matter
that new-style classes are a necessary condition for Jython
future than my availability or non- of time.

Considering that nobody had the stretch of time that Guido had
to implement new-style classes we could be in far far worse shape.

But it is definitely people choice, either we play doom and gloom
or ...





>  And "the creation of a lot of "boiler plate
>  
> >code"" scares me. Shouldn't it be generated or byte
>  
>  code injected.

it is generated.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
Jython-dev@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev