>  I placed a print in xpcom/server/loader.py:ModuleLoader->loadModule:
>  
>  def loadModule(self, aFile):
>           print "-- loadModule path", aFile.path
>           return self._getCOMModuleForLocation(aFile)
>  
>  And when I link my whole components directory into the App-folder
>  (including all non-XPCOM-python files) 

So don't do that!

>  I get a lot of this:
>  
>  -- loadModule path
>  /Users/lauri/Documents/koodi/CommunityTV/branches/smak2/components/SMAK
>  /semantic_overlay/scripts/probe.pyc
>  DEBUG:xpcom:'int8 loadModule(in nsISomething, out retval
>  nsISomething);'
>  raised COM Exception -2147024809 (-2147024809)
>  Traceback (most recent call last):
>     File
>  "/Users/lauri/Documents/koodi/CommunityTV/branches/smak2/XULSmak.app/Co
>  ntents/Frameworks/XUL.framework-debug-trunk-
>  2/python/xpcom/server/policy.py",
>  
>  line 277, in _CallMethod_
>       return 0, func(*params)
>     File
>  "/Users/lauri/Documents/koodi/CommunityTV/branches/smak2/XULSmak.app/Co
>  ntents/Frameworks/XUL.framework-debug-trunk-
>  2/python/xpcom/server/loader.py",
>  
>  line 96, in loadModule
>       return self._getCOMModuleForLocation(aFile)
>     File
>  "/Users/lauri/Documents/koodi/CommunityTV/branches/smak2/XULSmak.app/Co
>  ntents/Frameworks/XUL.framework-debug-trunk-
>  2/python/xpcom/server/loader.py",
>  
>  line 102, in _getCOMModuleForLocation
>       raise xpcom.ServerException(nsError.NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG)
>  ServerException: -2147024809 (-2147024809)
>  
>  Which comes from loader.py:ModuleLoader->_getCOMModuleForLocation:
>  
>  if not fqn.endswith(".py"):
>  	raise xpcom.ServerException(nsError.NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG)
>  
>  
>  So it seems that loadModule is getting all the files from the
>  subdirectories as well. As I can't find anything under
>  XUL.framework/python that calls loadModule, I'm guessing that the "new
>  feature" is somewhere outside pyxpcom and instead of just getting
>  .py-files, loadModule receives all of them.

The stuff in the 'component' directory is only supposed to relate to
components.  Trying to convince the system to use a more general-purpose
directory to store components is not a supported use-case.  Maybe you can
step back and tell us what problem you were trying to solve in the first
place?

Mark


_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs