lekma wrote:
>  while I agree that on windows and mac it makes sense to build the
>  pyxpcom extension  using ucs2, it seems that most linux distro (at
>  least the five i checked: debian, redhat, ubuntu, suse, gentoo) ship a
>  python build in ucs4, so maybe for linux ucs4 should be the default.
>    

I'm still undecided which of ucs2 or ucs4 is better for the linux 
platform. Yes, it seems most of the linux distros are using ucs4 builds 
of python, so ucs4 could make it easier to support python binary modules 
on linux. I'd be interested to know if anyone has had some experience in 
this area?

>  On a side note i'd be really interested to know how you build the
>  extension. In fact, I'd like to know how/what do you extract from a
>  python enabled xulrunner build to make an independent extension. Is it
>  all a manual process?
> 
>  thanks for any help/pointers
>    

You can find all of the source code (build scripts, patches and info) here:
http://pyxpcomext.mozdev.org/source.html

Cheers,
Todd

_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs