Mark Hammond wrote:
>  Shane writes:
>    
> > One thing that should be considered, the Mozilla code base itself is
> > UCS2 (actually UTF-16).  If Python uses UCS4, then every xpcom call
> > that
> > passes wstring in the IDL will do a string conversion.  The more
> > efficient approach is UCS2 if python is included as part of the
> > extension.
> >     
> 
>  I agree - IMO, for platforms that offer the possibility to choose, and
>  absent any other compelling reason, we should match the size of Mozilla's
>  and Python's Unicode implementation.
>    

Thanks, that makes sense. I'll stick with the ucs2 builds on Linux.

Cheers,
Todd

_______________________________________________
pyxpcom mailing list
pyxpcom@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs