[TCLCORE] 112 and 150 Vote Results
by Donal K. Fellows other posts by this author
Sep 26 2003 12:30PM messages near this date
Re: [TCLCORE] CFV: TIP#112 and TIP#150
|
Re: [TCLCORE] CFV: TIP#112 and TIP#150
Voting on these TIPs closed a little while ago. Here are the results (please
contact me if you feel that I miscounted)
TIP#112: Accepted 8/3 with 2 abstentions
FOR: DKF, JH, KBK, AKu, JN, JO, DGP, MDJ
AGAINST: MH, MMc, GAH
PRESENT: BW, DRH
Primary reasons for no votes were lack of C API, lack of a core migration
strategy, and the fact that it just wasn't the same as the Itcl ensemble
scheme. Is this correct? (Author to do a follow-up TIP on these matters as
time permits.)
TIP#150: Accepted 7/0 with 3 abstentions
FOR: DKF, MH, JH, MMc, GAH, JN, BW
AGAINST:
PRESENT: AKu, KBK, DGP
Primary reasons for concerns with this TIP were working out whether the security
built into COM is sufficient. Is this correct?
Donal.
--
Donal K. Fellows http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~fellowsd/ donal.fellows@[...].uk
-- Prices aren't rising - discounts are falling! It's WalMart-in-reverse! I'm
not spending more, I'm saving less! -- Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@[...].com>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-Core@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core
|