Re: Compiler used for building ActivePython
by Joanthan Gilligan other posts by this author
Oct 1 2004 6:07AM messages near this date
view in the new Beta List Site
Re: PyPPM replacement [was Re: Compiler used for building ActivePython]
|
Re: Compiler used for building ActivePython
It's pretty straightforward to build Python and the Win32all extensions
with the newer VC++.NET compiler, so for people who need to build
additional modules there's no real need to use the Active State binary
distro.
As far as waiting for a PyPPM replacement, ActiveState's Trent Mick said
last May that "a PyPPM-like tool is not tractable without high ongoing
maintenance costs," which makes it "difficult to make a
business case for a PyPPM-like tool."
--On Friday, October 01, 2004 8:10 AM -0400 Bob Kline
<bkline@[...].com> wrote:
> How much longer does ActiveState plan on using the old Microsoft
> compiler (from VS6) for building Python for win32? Makes it a little
> bit of a pain for building extensions. Especially during this limbo
> period while we're waiting for PyPPM's replacement (any word on progress
> for that?)
Thread:
Bob Kline
Trent Mick
Bob Kline
Trent Mick
Joanthan Gilligan
|