On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:41:12 +0300, Magnus Lie Hetland  
<magnus@[...].org>  wrote:

>  Peter Damoc <pdamoc@[...].net>:
> >
>  [snip]
> > I'm for the QT like approach NOT the wxWidgets one.
> 
>  So this would be like Java Swing? (Just checking.)

hmm... I don't know all that much about Swing but I think it will differ  
 from their approach. :)
IIRC Swing draws the interface elements using Java code. I'm more for  
moving all the low level drawing to an optimised C/C++ renderer.

>  [snip]
> > This is in my view the best approach: Implement as much as possible
> > in python and reuse some of the code from  one of those projects
> > altho it might not be all that easy to "extract" the  necessary bits
> > from their source tree.
> 
>  Sounds like a sound enough approach, I guess.
> 
> > The idea is to forgo all the unnecessary, C++ related bits from the
> > toolkit that have counterparts in python and keep only the minimum.
> 
>  IIRC, one of your questions was what you could reuse from Anygui?
> 
>  To begin with, I guess you could simply write a back-end using your
>  approach -- but many of the Anygui mechanisms would be highly
>  unnecessary (i.e., the whole front-end/back-end stuff). The event
>  handling stuff could perhaps be useful, and maybe some of the
>  model/observable stuff...
> 

I'll look at them.

Peter.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf