Re: Review: Boost Test Library
by other posts by this author
Feb 16 2001 3:19PM messages near this date
Re: [boost] Re: Review: Boost Test Library
|
Re: [boost] Re: Review: Boost Test Library
--- In boost@[...].. , Mark Rodgers <mark.rodgers@[...]..> wrote:
> From: <williamkempf@[...]..>
> --- In boost@[...].. , Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer@[...]..> wrote:
> > > The review for Beman Dawes' proposal of a Boost Test Library...
> >
> > I'm going to be using the test_lib stuff during my final
polishing
> > of the BTL...
>
> So does T stand for Test or Thread? Looks like Test will be first.
> But surely T should have been reserved for Template. :-)
>
> Can we please stop this trend of calling all our libraries BxL?
> I am ever so easily confused.
The Boost Thread Library was the first to be called the BTL,
regardless of the chronology of acceptance ;).
Seriously, though, someone else coined the acronym, not myself. I'm
not married to any name or acronym at this point, though there will
be a lot of documentation to change if we go by a different
name/acronym at this point, and it's just going to get worse. So...
if anyone has a different name, or thinks that we should stick with
Boost Thread Library but not use the acronym BTL, speak up now so I
can proactively avoid work in the future :).
Bill Kempf
Thread:
Jens Maurer
Ed Brey
Beman Dawes
Jens Maurer
Beman Dawes
Jens Maurer
Jens Maurer
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
Mark Rodgers
Kevlin Henney
Kevlin Henney
Ronald Garcia
Mark Rodgers
Ed Brey
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
Beman Dawes
Ed Brey
Jens Maurer
Beman Dawes
Ed Brey
|