Daryle,

I guess that makes sense. It's such a shame that we need to make testing the
operators library dependent on another substantial boost library... but OK.

I'm looking forward to getting your stuff integrated into operators.hpp. I
think your last version was probably a big improvement over what was there,
but I hope you also undertstand that a careful review of sweeping changes
takes time and I can only afford to do it once in a while... ;-)

Regards,
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: Daryle Walker <darylew@[...]..> 
To: Boost <boost@[...].com> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: [boost] Question on operators_test.cpp


>  I noticed that file /libs/utility/operators_test.cpp uses the
>  /boost/min_rand.hpp header, which has been considered obsolete. Should
I
>  change it for the next revision of operators sub-library (coming soon)?
If
>  so, what should it change to? I guess the 'minstd_rand' class in the
>  /boost/random.hpp header is supposed to be the closest analog.
> 
>  --
>  Daryle Walker
>  Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
>  darylew AT mac DOT com
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
>