Re: [boost] Lambda library - comparison with FACT and other solutions?
by Peter Dimov other posts by this author
Mar 18 2002 1:24PM messages near this date
Re: [boost] Re: Review: lambda library
|
is_class
From: <nbecker@[...]..>
> I haven't look at any of the technical issues, but from a purely
> esthetic view I prefer the familiar, explicit lambda(x, y, x + y) .
Sometimes the choice is not so clear-cut.
std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), std::cout << _1 << '\n');
vs
std::for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), lambda(x, std::cout << x << '\n'));
In general, I find that every non-pure-functional use looks better with the
_N syntax; lambda() implies a pure function as far as I'm concerned.
|