"David Abrahams" <david.abrahams@[...].com>  writes:

| From: "Richard Peters" <R.A.Peters@[...].nl> 
> 
> > Then you can replace the postfix increment operator with
> >
> >     number operator++(int)
> >     { return postfix_increment(*this); }
> 
| Why not just:
> 
|     number operator++(int)
|     {
|         return postfix_incrementer<number> (*this);
|     }
> 
| ?

When testing this and the prev. version with gcc, I get a 2:3
perfomance difference in favour of the traditional solution.

Gcc 3.1 -O3
./postincr
Number1: 6650000
Number2: 9900000

-- 
	Lgb
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost