From: "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" <larsbj@[...].org> 

>  When testing this and the prev. version with gcc, I get a 2:3
>  perfomance difference in favour of the traditional solution.
> 
>  Gcc 3.1 -O3
>  ./postincr
>  Number1: 6650000
>  Number2: 9900000

That's not surprising. What happens when you try the version that actually
returns the postfix_incrementer<number>  instead of the number?

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost