>  > I read somewhere an integer is always the size of a pointer.  What about
>  a
>  > (void *) in the worse case?
> 
>  You read wrong. Please get a copy of the standard and start studying. It
>  isn't fair to push a design that uses low-level hacks here without having
>  done at least some of the legwork to come to grips with what is and is not
>  conforming.

Yeah, I'll get the standards eventually because they seem a lot more
restrictive than I thought.  std::allocator<>  looks interesting for pointers
& allocators portability issues...



Philippe A. Bouchard





_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost