ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> boost
boost
[boost] Re: A comment and a question about the current configmacros
by Gennaro Prota other posts by this author
Aug 20 2002 10:05PM messages near this date
[boost] Re: A comment and a question about the current configmacros | Re: [boost] Re: A comment and a question about the current configmacros
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:59:00 -0500 (EST), Jeremy Siek
<jsiek@[...].edu>  wrote:

> Hi Gennaro,
> 
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Gennaro Prota wrote:
> gennar>
> gennar> Anyhow these are the main issues:
> gennar>
> gennar> a) you prefer making all data members (m_bits, m_num_bits,
> gennar> m_num_blocks) and base classes public for compilers that have
> gennar> BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_FRIENDS problems. There are 6 (now 5)
> gennar> functions that are involved in this problem: operator==, operator<,
> gennar> operator >, to_block_range and dump_to_string, which need to access
> gennar> the internal representation but are currently not members.
> [snip]
> 
> I respect your opinion, but chose to keep the code as it is now in this
> regard. This is not an important issue and enough time has already been
> spent on it.

I respect your opinion too. My intent was just to suggest what I
consider better for the quality of the code. No problem if you don't
agree, of course. 


> 
> gennar> b) many member functions are still extremely slow and now I don't have
> gennar> enough time to reimplement them.
> 
> Do you not have enough time over the next couple days, or do you not have
> enough time over the next few months? There is no rush. It is not the end
> of the world if all the optimizations do not go out this release. I am
> perfectly happy with the optimizations going in slowly as you or others
> have the time to put them in.


In the next two days. Optimizations require a lot of measurements.
Though some of them are quite obvious it takes a little
experimentation to avoid some compilers' idiosyncrasies. 


[snip]
> There is no last useful day. August 22 is just the next release. There
> will be another release a few month later, and another in a few months
> after that. Also, people can always grab the latest code out of CVS.

Yes. I meant for this release, of course. I'll work at the changes I
have in mind and will send you the code. Considering my current
engagements I expect this to happen some day in the next week.



Regards,
Genny.



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Gennaro Prota
John Maddock
Gennaro Prota
Gennaro Prota
Gennaro Prota
Beman Dawes
Jeremy Siek
Jeremy Siek
Gennaro Prota
Gennaro Prota
John Maddock
Beman Dawes

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved