ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> boost
boost
RE: [boost] shared-linkable-true, runtime-link-dynamic andruntime-link-static
by Jeff Garland other posts by this author
Oct 16 2002 2:16PM messages near this date
Re: [boost] shared-linkable-true, runtime-link-dynamic and runtime-link-static | [boost] boost::bind(f, ...) alternative syntax now in CVS
>  > Is it a bad idea to link dynamically to boost_thread and
>  > boost_date_time libraries? Or there is nothing wrong with it and all
>  > I have to do is add a dll rule for each of them?

There really shouldn't be a problem with dynamic linking of date_time.
However, about 95% of the library functions are inlined so I don't suspect
dynamic linking is going to save much.

Anyway, the real reason for the current state has more do with me 
not being an expert on Jamfile writing.  In fact, the Jamfile was 
initially written by a fellow booster and then hacked up by me.  
So I would be happy to take recommendations on changes to the 
Jamfile.

Jeff
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Alkis Evlogimenos
Rene Rivera
David Abrahams
Petr Kocmid
Alkis Evlogimenos
David Abrahams
Alkis Evlogimenos
David Abrahams
Neal D. Becker
Rene Rivera
Jeff Garland

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved