[boost] Re: Proposed Boost Assert -- once again
by Bertolt Mildner other posts by this author
Nov 15 2002 7:23PM messages near this date
Re: [boost] Re: Proposed Boost Assert -- once again
|
Re: [boost] Proposed Boost Assert -- once again
> > > #include <boost/current_function.hpp>
> >
> > I don't follow what this is about. The "handler," as I
> > understand it, is assertion_failed() declared below, so
> > why this header?
>
> boost/current_function.hpp defines the
> BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION macro.
BTW: CW also defines __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ (at least since 8.0)
diff -r1.3 current_function.hpp
30c30
< #if defined(__GNUC__)
---
> #if defined(__GNUC__) || (defined(__MWERKS__) && (__MWERKS__ >= 0x3000))
--
Free Crypto Token - FCT
www.FreeCryptoToken.org
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Kevin S. Van Horn
Peter Dimov
Bertolt Mildner
Peter Dimov
Fernando Cacciola
Peter Dimov
Rob Stewart
Fernando Cacciola
Fernando Cacciola
David Abrahams
Peter Dimov
Vladimir Prus
Peter Dimov
Eric Woodruff
|
