From: "David Abrahams" <dave@[...].com> 
>  >
>  > This doesn't look too good if you consider the possible boost->std
>  > transition. :-)
> 
>  But "sp" does? <wink>
> 
>     How about dynamic_pointer_cast<T>(x)?

Fine with me. You are the LWG guy around here. Whatever you say. ;-)

>  Of course, we can make it work for regular pointers, too.

That was kind of implied, yes, although I was more interested in extending
the same syntax to intrusive_ptr and other (Loki-style, for instance) smart
pointers.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost