Hi Csaba,

Let me try to answer this question since Jens Maurer, the author of 
boost random is often very busy, and I am a frequent user of his 
library.

On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 05:21 PM, Csaba Szepesvari wrote:
>  It would be nice to retrieve the current seed: I want to dump it so 
>  that
>  later I can reproduce the experiments I am running (that use the random
>  library).
>  Is there a bona fide reason not to return the seed (e.g. in the seed
>  function).

Some generators use not only a single seed number but a seed block of 
many numbers. Instead of returning a single seed number (which is the 
not possible), there are operators << and > > to save the state into a 
std::ostream and to restore it from a std::istream

>  The issue comes in when using seed without params (for "random"
>  initialization).

AFAIK using seed() without a parameter will not give a "random" 
initialization but the same initialization at every call.

Matthias

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost