>  Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>  ...are tailored towards java, and there is often either no C++ mapping or
one that I consider rather poor
>  as it doesn't make any use of C++ specific idioms.
> 
>  I wrote a C++ wrapper library around libxml2 (http://xmlsoft.org/),
>  and would like to submit it to boost. It currently provides a DOM-like
>  and a SAX-like interface, is parametrized for the (possibly unicode
>  enabled) string type, and has already proven its value for my own
>  projects.

What is wrong with Xerces-C++ library
(http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/index.html) ?

AC.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost