[boost] A Physical Quantity Type (was Re: Physical Quantity a
definition )
by Andy Little other posts by this author
Oct 30 2003 10:31AM messages near this date
[boost] Re: Physical Quantities revisited
|
[boost]
Physical Quantity a definition (was Re: Re: Physical Quantities revisited)
"Andy Little" <andy@[...].uk> wrote in message
news:bng7hr$ud4$1@[...]..
>
> "Phil Richards" <news@[...].uk> wrote in message
> news:20031024160836.4766C8C01C@[...]..
> > On 2003-10-24, Deane Yang <deane_yang@[...].com> wrote:
> > > I can't disagree with that, but from listening to the physicists
> explain
> > > their needs, I haven't heard anything that the physicists want that
> > > isn't also wanted by many of us non-physicists
[snip]
> > Why not start with what we know is wanted, and develop from that?
>
> I agree.
[snip]
> the first thing is to
> get a didactic definition of What this thing is, What it should do etc.
> So I will step back and attempt to work on that.
[snip]
I have provided a short overview to explain what the purpose of the type is
from the users point of view:
(There is potentially a lot more documentation to follow of course).
http://www.servocomm.freeserve.co.uk/Cpp/physical_quantity/abstract.html
Naturally any comments,views and criticisms are appreciated.
One important point that is not mentioned in the above link is that
implementation of the type (which I am now reasonably sure is practical )
is eminently suitable as a (practical realworld robust etc) platform for the
techniques currently being developed at boost.
The 'prototype' for a physical-quantity type , the inbuilt type, provides
formidable competition.
As to the Wiki. I have resolved to postpone that at the moment,
(finite time.. I will have to spend a lot of time to work out most effective
use of Wiki)
and concentrate on trying to explain what I think are the basic mechanisms
in more (non implementational) detail.
Whether this project will blossom or fizzle out I don't know,
but I would like to thank everyone who has participated
in the recent Physical Quantities and Dimensional Analysis threads.
I now have a much clearer view of what this thing is
... which I will attempt to convey in due course.
Andy Little
andy@[...].uk
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Andy Little
Andy Little
Andy Little
Andy Little
Andy Little
Andy Little
Andy Little
Jan Langer
Andy Little
Deane Yang
Paul A. Bristow
Phil Richards
Rene Jager
Deane Yang
Phil Richards
Andy Little
Deane Yang
Brock Peabody
Paul A. Bristow
Andy Little
Andy Little
Matthias Troyer
Paul A. Bristow
Ross MacGregor
Deane Yang
Paul A. Bristow
Deane Yang
Paul A. Bristow
Paul A. Bristow
David Abrahams
Jonathan de Halleux
Philip Miller
Deane Yang
Paul A. Bristow
Paul A. Bristow
David Abrahams
|