On 2/20/04 2:35 PM, "Douglas Paul Gregor" <gregod@[...].edu>  wrote:

>  On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian McNamara wrote:
> > I dunno if/what the plans are for a Boost "result_of" implementation
> > (Doug?), but that will be the keystone library component to this end, I
> > think.
>  
>  A couple more whacks of the boot and I'll finally bring this in. It's been
>  languishing in the sandbox for way too long. The major sticking point (and
>  it's a boring one) is that I need to put in workarounds for broken
>  compilers. I *hate* putting in workarounds for broken compilers.

Then don't.  You don't have to put in workarounds (unless _your_ compiler
needs them).  If someone complains, they can fix the code on their time.
(They should let you know first, though.)

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost