David Abrahams wrote:

>  Daniel Frey <d.frey@[...].de> writes:
> >I don't like the name of the function, as std_min doesn't hint me
> >about the ADL-nature of the call. Would adl_std_min be too much
> >typing? Or propbably just adl_min, as it's quite common to use
> >std::min if ADL doesn't find a better match. My $.02.
>  
>  
>  Looks to me as though boost::min_ is the best name for this thing.
>  

I tried to engage people in a discussion of these issues before making 
1000+ edit to correct this problem. Now, everybody want to change it. :-P

This would be a simple search/replace, so I don't mind. Can we all agree 
on boost::min_? I don't want to have to change it again.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost