Re: [boost] Re: FC++ formal review
by Brian McNamara other posts by this author
Mar 2 2004 1:28AM messages near this date
[boost] Re: FC++ formal review
|
[boost] Re: FC++ formal review
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:52:55PM -0700, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
...
> I understand that you formulated the concept of a direct functoid
> because there is a lot that can be done in FC++ using functoids which
> are only direct, not full, so requiring full functois everywhere would
> be overspecification. However, I think for maximal reuse I would
> always want full functoids.
>
> Does this make sense?
Yes, thanks. I'll have to mull over this a bit before I can express an
opinion one way or the other.
--
-Brian McNamara (lorgon@cc.gatech.edu)
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Jonathan Turkanis
Jaakko Jarvi
Brian McNamara
Paul Mensonides
Jonathan Turkanis
Jonathan Turkanis
Brian McNamara
David B. Held
Gennadiy Rozental
Darren Cook
Gennadiy Rozental
Jonathan Turkanis
|