ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> boost
boost
Re: [boost] Re: FC++ formal review
by Brian McNamara other posts by this author
Mar 2 2004 1:28AM messages near this date
[boost] Re: FC++ formal review | [boost] Re: FC++ formal review
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:52:55PM -0700, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
...
>  I understand that you formulated the concept of a direct functoid
>  because there is a lot that can be done in FC++ using functoids which
>  are only direct, not full, so requiring full functois everywhere would
>  be overspecification. However, I think for maximal reuse I would
>  always want full functoids.
>  
>  Does this make sense?

Yes, thanks.  I'll have to mull over this a bit before I can express an
opinion one way or the other.

-- 
-Brian McNamara (lorgon@cc.gatech.edu)
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Jonathan Turkanis
Jaakko Jarvi
Brian McNamara
Paul Mensonides
Jonathan Turkanis
Jonathan Turkanis
Brian McNamara
David B. Held
Gennadiy Rozental
Darren Cook
Gennadiy Rozental
Jonathan Turkanis

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved