ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> boost
boost
Re: [boost] Ranged type mini-library submission
by Rob Stewart other posts by this author
May 18 2004 1:42PM messages near this date
Re: [boost] Ranged type mini-library submission | Re: [boost] Ranged type mini-library submission
From: christopher diggins <cdiggins@[...].ca> 
>  From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff@[...].com>
>  > On Mon, 17 May 2004 11:53:49 -0400, christopher diggins wrote
>  >
>  > > There are just so many problems that can arise from
>  > > parameterized inheritance, I would like to avoid it if there is an
>  > > acceptable alternative.
>  >
>  > Such as?  I must have missed that section in MC++ design. And anyway, how
>  > would these issues apply here?
>  
>  I detect some frustration, I mean you no disrespect, I hold your work and
>  comments in very high esteem.

I think you misunderstood.  He was just trying to find out what
left the bad taste in your mouth.

>  I just changed the code by removing the public constraints typedef and
>  adding a static function get_constraints() so that it can be invoked using
>  instances of an object as well.
>  
>  The problem with parameter inheritance, as least in this case, is that it
>  surprises programmers by causing an object to have an inconsistent
>  interface. Most programmers when confronted with code such as mytype::max()
>  expect that max will be available for all instances of mytype. On the other
>  hand, mytype::get_constraints().max() is generally understood to not always
>  be readily available in a parameterized type.

I don't understand mytype::get_constraints().max() to not always
be available.  If I wanted that information, I'd write that
expression (instead of mytype::max()) and then be surprised when
it didn't work.

It's simple enough to require that the template parameter supply
min() and max() so that derivation yields those functions in
mytype's interface.  Then, it's a moot point whether min() and
max() are part of a static or non-static interface for mytype.

>  I don't see how the advantage of the shorthand justifies the case for
>  parameter inheritance here.

I don't see that you've solved any problem with your approach.

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart@[...].com
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
christopher diggins
christopher diggins
christopher diggins
Jeff Garland
christopher diggins
Rob Stewart
Jeff Garland
christopher diggins
christopher diggins
Robert Bell
christopher diggins
Jeff Garland
christopher diggins
christopher diggins
Jeff Garland
christopher diggins
christopher diggins
Robert Bell
Robert Bell
christopher diggins
Christoph Ludwig
christopher diggins
Daryle Walker
christopher diggins
Christoph Ludwig
christopher diggins
Rob Stewart
christopher diggins
Pavol Droba
Jeff Garland
christopher diggins
Victor A. Wagner Jr.
Jeff Garland
Victor A. Wagner Jr.
Jeff Garland
Jeff Garland
Victor A. Wagner Jr.

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved