>  Would it be possible to add ability to execute tests in random order,
>  instead of as they are added into suite?
> 
>  Example:
> 
>  test_suite* init_unit_test_suite(int argc, char * argv[]) {
>      test_suite* tests = BOOST_TEST_SUITE("...");
>      tests->add(BOOST_TEST_CASE(&test1));
>      tests->add(BOOST_TEST_CASE(&test2));
>      return tests;
>  }
> 
>  Here test1() will be always executed before test2(). This behaviour may
hide
>  errors.

As a rule you shouldn't rely on order of test cases.
Why not write 2 assertions that tests both orders?

>  It would be nice to have:
>  - possibility to say: now execute test in random order,
>  - if error happens framework would print out seed for random,
>  - ability set seed manually is needed to be able to repeat problem.

I am plan in this release add an ability to run a test case by name. It may
help you a bit. As for random order I will think about it, but it fills a
bit incorrect (see above).

Gennadiy.



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost