|
|
 |
boost
[boost] Re: [Boost.Test] New testing procedure?
by David Abrahams other posts by this author
May 23 2004 2:08AM messages near this date
RE: [boost] Re: [Boost.Test] New testing procedure?
|
[boost] Re: [Boost.Test] New testing procedure?
"Reece Dunn" <msclrhd@[...].com> writes:
> Is it possible to add the level as a parameter like how you can
> configure static/dynamic linking, e.g.:
>
> test basic : basic.cpp : <level>basic ;
> test complete : complete.cpp : <level>torture ;
>
> # basic-tests.sh
> bjam ... basic-test
>
> # full-tests.sh
> bjam ... full-test
It's easy enough to do something like that. You could just make
an additional "torture-test" target so you can do:
bjam test
or
bjam torture-test
or you could simply write in the Jamfile:
if --torture in $(ARGV)
{
# more tests here
}
and then:
bjam --torture test
which would make bjam faster for the non-torture cases.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Reece Dunn
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
|
|
|
 |
|