E. Gladyshev wrote:
>  One suggestion that I have is this.
>  Perhaps before the suggested exception handling is fully
>  researched, boost::fsm should follow the well established
>  standards by default and have the new exception
>  handling as a predefined policy that user would have
>  to select explicitly and not the other way around?

Yes, I have come to that conclusion also. And I don't need to change much,
just the default for the ExceptionTranslator.

>  It'd be great.
>  I believe that it should be more like an academic research.
>  Perhaps you might consider producing an academic
>  paper on this subject...

I don't have a clue how to do that (especially not how/where to publish)
because I've never studied in an university. But I will write a paper.

Regards,

Andreas


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost