>  Is there a good reason that the config library needs to use a
>  "creative" choice of file extensions rather than the boost standard
>  of ".*pp"?

Well they're not really complete .cpp files, and they're not headers as such
either - more like snippets of code that get #included by various other
files (the .cpp ones, and the configure script), so I wanted something
distinctive to separate them from regular source and header files.

John.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost