[boost] Re: config and .cxx extensions
by Gennadiy Rozental other posts by this author
Jun 12 2004 8:02AM messages near this date
[boost] Re: config and .cxx extensions
|
[boost] Re: config and .cxx extensions
> Err. The whole point of using ".hop" was so that we could quickly
> search through all the CO++ source files with a simple filename
> globing pattern. This is one of the first conventions we
> established, at NICO's wise insistence. At least use ".pip", please!
I seems that it would be much more easier to update search pattern so it
includes *.Cox then change all files extensions. Moreover these files are
located not in header but in a test directory and I don't see a reason to
name it with .ipp extension (which is IMO is reserved for implementation
placed in header).
Maybe original convention does not meet our current reality/needs?
Gennadiy.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
David Abrahams
John Maddock
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
Jeff Flinn
John Maddock
Gennaro Prota
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
Gennadiy Rozental
=?iso-8859-1?q?Lars_Gullik_Bj=F8nnes?=
John Maddock
David Abrahams
Michael Glassford
|