Re: [boost] Re: [Boost.Thread] mutex Win32 implementation changes
by val salamakha other posts by this author
Jul 25 2004 1:12AM messages near this date
[boost] Re: [Boost.Thread] mutex Win32 implementation changes
|
Re: [boost] Re: [Boost.Thread] mutex Win32 implementation changes
Alexander,
> --- Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@[...].de> wrote:
> I meant not the tennis stuff but the ACE's CV
> implementation.
> Well, I've just tried the latest and greatest ACE
> 5.4 on my
> MP IntelliStation. Same buggy behavior as in 2001.
> Looking
> at their CV impl, I see that they've not changed
> anything.
If you want to discuss concerning ACE, please use
PROBLEM_REPORT_FORM and send a report to ace-users
forum or onto my private address - not to boost forum.
It refines the problem and makes our discussion
subject-oriented without useless emotions.
Secondly, no need to re-invent a wheel again. If you
want reliable signaling between threads on Windows,
use the HANDLE-based Win32 mutex instead of playing
around "CRITICAL SECTION" implementations in your
wrapper class. Do not forget to mention about core of
the Win32 pseudo-mutex class as it did in ACE.
Take care
Valery
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Thread:
Michael Glassford
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Peter Dimov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
val salamakha
val salamakha
val salamakha
val salamakha
Peter Dimov
Alexander Terekhov
Peter Dimov
Alexander Terekhov
Peter Dimov
Peter Dimov
Alexander Terekhov
Peter Dimov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Alexander Terekhov
Michael Glassford
Alexander Terekhov
Michael Glassford
|