SOURCE > ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andreas Huber" <ah2003@[...].net>
> To: <boost@[...].org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 9:51 AM
> Subject: [boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]
> 
> [...]
> 
> >
> >  Yes, you can do that if you want (it is a per state machine policy). The
> >  default is to always dispatch an exception_thrown event.
> >
> 
> Interesting solution!
> catch
> {
> 	try { throw; }
> 	catch( type1 ) { ... }
> }
> 
> never thought about it. This is why I didn't know
> how to make it generic. It makes sense now.

I've written code like that.
It lets you centralize a bunch of exception handling:

	try { ...code that throws }
	catch ( ... ) { HandleExceptions (); }

void HandleExceptions () {
	try { throw; }
	catch ( type1 ) {}
	catch ( type2 ) {}
	catch ( type3 ) {}
and so on.
	}

-- 
-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:marshall@[...].com> 

I want a machine that thinks I'm more important than it is, and acts like it.
-- Eric Herrmann
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost