SOURCE G'day all.

John Maddock wrote:

>  Those of a mathematical inclination, might be interested to note that the
>  only substantive code in the TR1 submission currently under review is some
>  proposed additions to Boost.Math: mainly the inverse complex number trig
>  functions.

Sorry, I haven't been keeping up with this.  Do I read it as meaning
that [tr.num.sf] is not present in the current submission?

Cheers,
Andrew Bromage
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost