SOURCE Jeff Garland wrote:
>  
>  I think better installers is certainly an important part of this puzzle.
>  Still, I suspect there will be folks that are intimidated anyway.  There's
>  lots of reasons for this attitude -- most of which I think we cannot solve...
>  

I'd like to see boost build a single dll/lib rather than multiples if 
that is what people like - possibly with the option to specify which 
libs go in it.  We currently use

thread
date_time
filesystem
regex
serialization

And in some places test also.  I'd rather just one DLL was generated, or 
at least the option to link to just boost-1.32 rather than 5 or more 
individual libs.

Cheers

Russell

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost