"Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge@[...].com>  writes:

>  On 2 Oct 2003 at 11:40, scott snyder wrote:
> 
> > Looking at the code in enum.cpp, is see that it keeps the enum items
> > in a map indexed by the value --- so values added later overwrite any
> > added earlier.
> > 
> > It's common to use C++ enums to define small integral constants,
> > in addition to using them for things which are actual enumerations. So
> > the case of multiple enum symbols with the same value really should be
> > supported.
> 
>  I completely agree. Perhaps a reimplementation of enum.cpp Dave?

Something's in order.  I'm not very fond of Scott's specific patch,
though (sorry).  I'll give it some thought.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig