> > If you compare the code and the wiki page, please feel free to make
> > any necessary corrections to the wiki.
>  Done. 

Thanks!

>  I'm still left with the feeling, though, that this function
>  is a good example for a mismatch in its intent as expressed
>  in the function name, "get package releases" (note the plural
>  form), and the default value for its "show_hidden" parameter
>  (False).

There is a lot discussion on the "hidden" feature of PyPI.
Even if you set show_hidden to False, you may still get multiple
packages, if there are multiple non-hidden ones - it's not
required that all releases are hidden but one.

As a package owner, you have a Hide? drop-down for each release,
which you can set as you wish.

I've rephrased the wiki, but it's probably possible to use better
words to describe this flag.

> > https://svn.python.org/packages/trunk/pypi/rpc.py
>  
>  In fact, this, too, would benefit from a couple of docstrings.

Certainly. Much of it is a shallow wrapper around a store.py
routine; those do have docstrings.

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig