Check the CVS and see for yourself ;-)

BTW, shall I give you CVS access? I think it would be much better if you
were making incremental progress on the CVS state than if you save
everything and dump a big patch on me later...

-Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh@[...].com> 
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.c++
To: <c++-sig@[...].org> 
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: [C++-sig] Re: Re: Re: Compile failure with object in V2


> 
>  "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams@[...].com> wrote in message
>  news:1db401c22b53$42a03230$6601a8c0@[...]..
>  >
>  >
>  > It seems like a fine patch; I'm checking it in!
>  > BTW, I notice you slipped in the default None constructor; I'm adding
that
>  > also.
>  >
>  I forgot that was there...
>  I assume you guessed the missing part:
> 
>  inline object::object()
>      : object_base(incref(Py_None))
>  {}
> 
>  Dave Hawkes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  C++-sig mailing list
>  C++-sig@[...].org
>  http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
> 



_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig