Sorry I never answered this one. The low-level conversion mechanisms are
likely to continue to traffic in raw PyObject*s, at least for a while. I'm
trying to avoid imposing unneccessary overheads (mostly in code size), but
since I've never measured it I'd be willing to entertain a change...

-Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh@[...].com> 
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.c++
To: <c++-sig@[...].org> 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: [C++-sig] to_python_converter and object


>  I was about to do some testing that involved using to_python_converter
and
>  noticed that there does not appear to be direct support for a convert
>  function that returns an object instead of a PyObject*, is this something
>  that is likely to be changed?
> 
>  Thanks
>  Dave Hawkes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  C++-sig mailing list
>  C++-sig@[...].org
>  http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig



_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig