ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> cpp-sig
cpp-sig
Re: [C++-sig] Boost V1 build on Solaris
by Leonardo Rochael Almeida other posts by this author
Oct 24 2002 5:38PM messages near this date
Re: [C++-sig] Boost V1 build on Solaris | Re: [C++-sig] Boost V1 build on Solaris
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 22:36, Paul F. Kunz wrote:
>     One final question, which is not specific to boost::python but
>  general question on building Python modules.   What my Solaris
>  administrators have done is to configure Python with 
>  
>  >  ./configure
>   --prefix=/afs/.slac.stanford.edu/package/python/common/2.0
>   --exec-prefix=/afs/.slac.stanford.edu/package/python/sun4x_55/2.0
>  
>  They also did a build fron Linux with the appropriate `exec-prefix'.
>  What apparently this has done is to put all but one of the Python
>  include files in the directory `common/2.0/include'.  But Python.h
>  includes `config.h' or `pyconfig.h' (depending on the version) which
>  gets installed in `sun4x_55/2.0/include'.  This is appropriate since
>  this file is machine/OS dependent.
>  
>     Now the problem is that boost::python, and other packages, gives you
>  one variable, like PYTHON_INCLUDES,  for its build.   When it is set to find
>  `Python.h' it will not find `pyconfig.h'.   
>  
>     What is the best way to handle this situation?   Is it a bug in
>  Python's configure script?   Bug in boost::python and others?   Or am
>  I missing something obvious?

Your setup requires that sun4x_55/2.0/include is in the include path
somehow (i.e. it should be in the -I parameter of all compiler
invocations). Reading <boost> tools/build/gcc-tools.jam makes me believe
that you can make your setup work by adding the following line to your
<boost> /Jamrules file:

STDHDRS += /afs/.slac.stanford.edu/package/python/sun4x_55/2.0


IMO, the proper way to fix this would be to make boost.python accept a
PYTHON_EXECUTABLE variable which we could set like:

PYTHON_EXECUTABLE ?= /usr/local/bin/python2.2

This way, boost could probe python for its version and distutil
infrastructure for all apropriate include and link flags. This is what
Psycopg does in it's ./configure script (e.g. --with-python=...)

-- 
Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like
solitary confinement.


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
Thread:
Paul F. Kunz
Paul F. Kunz
David Abrahams
Leonardo Rochael Almeida
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
David Abrahams
Leonardo Rochael Almeida
David Abrahams
Paul F. Kunz
David Abrahams
Paul F. Kunz
Paul F. Kunz

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved