Thanks for the fix!

--On Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:48 PM -0400 David Abrahams 
<dave@[...].com>  wrote:

>  gideon may <gideon@[...].org> writes:

<snip> 

> 
>  Perhaps... a bug in Boost.Python??!
> 
>  Fixed in CVS, thanks for reporting it.  Extra bonus points if you can
>  supply a patch to the test that will detect this bug!

Thanks, will try it immediately. I'm afraid I have to let the bonus
points pass, since there is no way to track if objects have really been
deleted; except if you define COUNT_ALLOCS while building python :(

> 
> > I'm using return_internal_reference quite extensively and couldn't live
> > without it :-)
> 
>  Doubtless that's true.  I can't believe I never saw this one before.
>  That's what you get for not having tests :(

Hmm, still hard to test this one, the garbage collector reports all
objects deleted, even if the weak references are not.

ciao,

gideon


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig