David Abrahams wrote:

> Nicodemus <nicodemus@[...].br> writes:
> 
>   
> 
> >>I also like Dave's suggestion to use the term 'final' to denote virtual
> >>functions that  are not expected to be overloadable from Python.
> >> 
> >>      
> >>
> >I considered it too, but I thought that "no_override" was more
> >clear. What you guys think?
> >    
> >
> 
> WWJD - What Would Java Do?
> 
> I think it depends on whether "final" on a Java method means you can
> write a new (non-virtually-dispatched) one of that name or not.
> 

I believe that in this context, "final" has the same meaning as in 
Java... I do not like it much because the meaning is not obvious from 
the word alone, but perhaps using a familiar term to some other 
programmers might be better than coming up with a new one?


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig