Nicodemus, Dave:

Either one, no_override or final seem fine, doesn't matter so much.

Nicodemus, you're right, I am using stock 1.3.0, so I guess the bug
I've mentioned is irrelevant. 

Do you guys know, is there a way to get a CVS snapshot without actually
using CVS, i.e. are nightly snapshots available for download somewhere,
I couldn't find it on sourceforge...

Thanks!

Roman

--- Nicodemus <nicodemus@[...].br>  wrote:
>  David Abrahams wrote:
>  
>  >Nicodemus <nicodemus@[...].br> writes:
>  >
>  >  
>  >
>  >>>I also like Dave's suggestion to use the term 'final' to denote
>  virtual
>  >>>functions that  are not expected to be overloadable from Python.
>  >>> 
>  >>>      
>  >>>
>  >>I considered it too, but I thought that "no_override" was more
>  >>clear. What you guys think?
>  >>    
>  >>
>  >
>  >WWJD - What Would Java Do?
>  >
>  >I think it depends on whether "final" on a Java method means you can
>  >write a new (non-virtually-dispatched) one of that name or not.
>  >
>  
>  I believe that in this context, "final" has the same meaning as in 
>  Java... I do not like it much because the meaning is not obvious from
>  
>  the word alone, but perhaps using a familiar term to some other 
>  programmers might be better than coming up with a new one?
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  C++-sig mailing list
>  C++-sig@[...].org
>  http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig