"Joel de Guzman" <djowel@[...].uk>  writes:

>  Raoul Gough <RaoulGough@[...].uk> wrote:
[snip]
> > So what do you think of the idea of providing a proxy-container-
> > wrapper, instead of integrating the proxy support directly into the
> > indexing suite? C++ code would then be aware (and have direct access
> > to) the wrapped container, and it might significantly simplify the
> > internals of the indexing suite.
> 
>  Looks like a good idea. Feel free to try it out. I'm all for further
>  refactoring.

I won't get to look at this any further today, but it's probably a two
or three day (part-time) job anyway. I'll have a go at it, unless you
decide to work on it yourself (please let me know if you do, though!)

-- 
Raoul Gough
"Let there be one measure for wine throughout our kingdom, and one
measure for ale, and one measure for corn" - Magna Carta


_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig