Re: [C++-sig] void* questions\thoughts
by David Abrahams other posts by this author
Oct 31 2005 8:34AM messages near this date
Re: [C++-sig] void* questions\thoughts
|
Re: [C++-sig] void* questions\thoughts
"Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge@[...].com> writes:
> Dave, what was the rationale for not supporting void as an opaque
> type?
I didn't design the opaque types support; I guess nobody considered
void when it was designed.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
C++-sig mailing list
C++-sig@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
Thread:
Roman Yakovenko
Niall Douglas
David Abrahams
Roman Yakovenko
David Abrahams
Niall Douglas
David Abrahams
Niall Douglas
|