Re: [DB-SIG] annotated 1.1 spec / feedback
by James Northrup other posts by this author
Mar 17 1999 2:46PM messages near this date
Re: [DB-SIG] Last round for DB API 1.1
|
Re: [DB-SIG] annotated 1.1 spec / feedback
> Hmm. We could try getting the DB API specification into the standard
> docs for Python. That would add a little more "official" flavor to
> our work.
questions regarding this sig:
1) Is there an issue in publishing a module of abstract classes to adhere to ?
2) Why stop at the docs for python if we can publish self documented base classes as well?
I have looked frantically for a dbapi.py and all I have found are disparate c modules that d
on't have parent class interfaces.
If such an animal exists, I would love a pointer. I would gladly step out of this discussio
n and into one about improving such a module.
3) Java has a comfortable "Interface/Impl" flavor of libraries, why is the db-api an etherea
l specification of convention rather than an entry point in code interface?
|