RE: [exslt] exslt functions problem
by Glenn Ingalls other posts by this author
Mar 6 2002 8:14AM messages near this date
Re: [exslt] exslt functions problem
|
Re: [exslt] exslt functions problem
I also found that using include rather than import cured many hours of
headaches - have we determined that "import" doesn't work? Is there an
advantage/purpose to using import rather than include?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: exslt-admin@[...].com
> [mailto:exslt-admin@[...].com]On Behalf Of Graham Seaman
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:59 AM
> To: Jeni Tennison
> Cc: list@[...].org
> Subject: Re: [exslt] exslt functions problem
>
>
> Hi Jeni,
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
> > It should run correctly. It runs just fine with libxslt if you include
> > test.xsl rather than importing it, and it runs OK with Saxon, so I
> > think it's a bug in the libexslt (or possibly libxslt) implementation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jeni
> >
> Thanks - all the permutations I tried on namespaces, and I never thought
> of using include instead of import! I guess I can live with that.
>
> Thanks again
> Graham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> exslt mailing list
> list@[...].org
> http://www.exslt.org/list
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
list@[...].org
http://www.exslt.org/list
Thread:
Graham Seaman
Glenn Ingalls
Jeni Tennison
|