Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>  In order to correct this situation, I propose the definition of
>  exslt:node-set() to be changed:
> 
>  "The exsl:node-set function takes an argument, which is a result
>  tree fragment and returns a node set, which has exactly the same
>  structure, names and values nodes. The exslt:node-set() function
>  does not have side effects, e.g. it does not change the its
>  argument".

I agree. Anyone else have an objection?

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
list@[...].org
http://www.exslt.org/list